You are now viewing:
Module 2:
>
Unit 5
 

Unit 5: Integrating Bioenergy Harvesting with Silviculture

Sierra Pacific Industries                                                                                     page 1 of 2

Although the revenue obtained from the biomass does not always cover all harvesting and transportation costs, Sierra Pacific Industries in northern California

has integrated bioenergy harvesting into their forest management plans (H Baldwin and M Mitzel personal communication). According to SPI management, they do this because the removal of the biomass substantially reduces the costs of other forest operations and reduces the risk and liabilities associated with forest fires.

 

Many SPI forests in inland northern California are degraded natural ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) stands with a history of high-grading. To regenerate these stands, SPI clearcuts small blocks which are planted with genetically improved seedlings and

 

Sierra Pacific Industries Operations
Sierra Pacific Industries Operations
Don Mead

 

 

Sierra Pacific Industries Operations
Sierra Pacific Industries Operations
Don Mead

 

managed as even-aged plantations using intensive silviculture. Establishment typically includes ripping and weed control. Since fire is a high risk and carries large liabilities if it spreads to adjacent land, it is important to reduce residual biomass on the site. If bioenergy harvesting were not carried out, the slash would need to be piled and burned, a practice that itself carries considerable risk, causes smoke pollution, and can be safely undertaken only a few days each year. Thus biomass harvesting at clearcutting:

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

1

  • improves access to the site for ripping, planting and weed control;
  • removes the necessity to pile and burn residues;
  • reduces costs of establishing the new crop by as much as $150 per acre (2006 data); and
  • is more environmentally friendly than other alternatives. 

 

Sierra Pacific Industries Operations
Sierra Pacific Industries Operations
Don Mead

 

Because of the cost savings, the operation can be justified on sites where the direct costs of removing residue, chipping and transportation are not fully covered by the payment made by the energy company.

 

 

©2007 National Learning Center for Private Forest and Range Landowners
"A program of the Cooperative Extension Service funded by the Renewable Resources Extension Act"
Last Updated: June 2, 2008