Center's logo National Web-Based Learning Center for Nonfederal Forest and Range Lands
Center's logo
home || search this site || learning options || references & links
 
Home
Beef Cattle Management
Water Quality
Tree Restoration
Pasture Establishment
Fencing Out Wildlife
Weed Management
Economic Issues
Tax Implications
Supplemental Material

 

Page 8 of 11
Topics within this tutorial

 

Tree and Forest Restoration - Pros and cons of salvage logging in perspective

Burned areas, particularly those with severe fire effects must be considered “ecologically sensitive', especially during the first several years following the fire. Water is the greatest source of soil erosion in Inland Northwest forests—therefore, the benefits of increased infiltration rates due to soil disturbance must be weighed against the potential of greater soil erosion. Logging activities immediately after a fire event have the greatest beneficial potential since this is also when water infiltration rates are lowest and erosion rates the highest. This is also when seed-bed modification may enhance recovery rates of desirable native plants. Logging during the growing season six months following fires may have the greatest detrimental effects by disrupting plant recolonization.

In the spring and summer following a fire, specific native “colonizer” species such as fireweed have been shown to rapidly invade severely burned areas. Surveys of lower elevation sites that burned in the Bitterroot during 2000 have shown that fireweed provides approximately 50 percent surface cover, helping to stabilize soils. Logging during the growing season on such sites can have significant detrimental soil effects, as the stabilization associated with such early successional plants will be disrupted. Logging on a snowpack or frozen ground in the years following a wildfire may alleviate some of these negative effects.

Although noxious weeds may be vectored by logging activities, proper treatment of equipment prior to transport into burned areas can be very effective at reducing this risk. Many members of the Montana. Logging Association have partici- pated in weed workshops where such practices are taught. Other factors such as human use (mushroom picking for example), wildlife and existing weed sources must also be taken into consideration.

Shading effects of dead standing snags and logging debris should theoretically increase colonization rates of native plant species and tree seedlings. Which has the greater effect is often debated. The com- monly accepted average temperature lethal to plants is 125° F (55° C) for one minute. Since measured surface temperatures are commonly above 150° F on burned sites, beneficial effects of shade created by materials more than three feet above the soil surface is minimized due to the rapid movement of that shade with the sun. Logs that are horizontal across the soil surface will have a greater shade effect for the creation of microsites. This may be a positive aspect of salvage logging if logging debris is properly distributed.

Research indicates that roughly 90 percent of the nutrients incorporated by tree biomass are located in small diameter structures such as twigs and needles. Salvage logging removes larger diameter bole wood that is suitable for lumber production and leaves the finer materials. The role of larger diameter woody debris in soil development has also been recognized as important, and therefore, should be taken in consider- ation. Typically, logging results in a significant number of large diameter logs with too much defect for mills. Proper distribution of these materials across the landscape should be an important component of good slash management.

Woody organic matter becomes an important soil component when it has reached advanced stages of decompo- sition and is capable of retaining large quantities of moisture. At this point it is also a lesser contributor towards wildfire risk. In contrast, dry intact logs represent a considerable risk for severe fire effects. In any fire-prone ecosystem, the potential soil benefit from decomposed organic debris is offset by the high fire risk period while organic debris is decomposing. Depending on the forest type, a log may require between 20 and 200 years to reach an advanced stage of decom- position. During this time, the site is at risk of soil degradation from a severe fire. The higher the organic debris component, the higher the potential soil benefits but also the higher the risk of losing it all from fire.

There is substantial evidence that standing dead or dying trees resulting from wildfires do provide habitat for a variety of wildlife. Most of the species involved are categorized as fire “opportunists” that benefit from fires but are not dependant on the effects of wildfires. Nonetheless, leaving fire damaged/killed trees for wildlife habitat is an important consideration. In attempt to provide for this need, many salvage logging protocols call for certain numbers of large diameter leave trees per unit area. While this may be helpful for some species, other research indicates that wildlife such as Black-backed woodpeckers require dense stands of fire-affected trees. Therefore, leaving patches of fire killed trees along with other areas that have widely distrib- uted snags may be the best approach. Much additional research is needed to answer questions of how much, in what distribution, and what species of trees are needed.

Based on this brief summary of the issues surrounding salvage logging, it is apparent that there are potential ecological benefits from salvage logging and potential ecological detriments. The ecological side of the question: “Should salvage logging occur?” is really one that revolves around the magnitude of the fire effects. Removal of all trees killed by fire will have a potentially negative impact on wildlife and may reduce soil productivity in the long term. Removal of some of the trees coupled with sound slash management has the potential of decreasing soil surface erosion, decreasing future risk of severe wildfire effects and increasing recovery rates of desirable vegetation. No manipulation of severely burned areas will result in soil erosion risks, future severe wildfire risks and conversely, a large pool of organic matter for wildlife use and future soil amendments. The larger the area affected by fire, the greater the possibil- ity of creating a mosaic of salvage and no-salvage logged areas that could enhance the benefits from both.