Center's logo National Web-Based Learning Center for Nonfederal Forest and Range Lands
Center's logo
home || search this site || learning options || references & links
 
Home
Beef Cattle Management
Water Quality
Tree Restoration
Pasture Establishment
Fencing Out Wildlife
Weed Management
Economic Issues
Tax Implications
Supplemental Material

 

Page 20 of 23
Topics within this tutorial

 

Rangeland Weed Management - Summary

Fire-produced disturbances directly favor colonization of new and survived noxious weeds. To prevent or mitigate establishment of noxious weeds, and to establish or maintain healthy plant communities, burned and adjacent areas should be managed under a burned-area IWM plan.

When desired plant cover is inadequate, the first step of many burned-area IWM plans is revegetation. Revegetation, when needed, can mitigate weed invasion and reestablishment by introducing desired plants that compete with weeds for resources.

A burned-area IWM plan incorporates land management goals and weed management objectives.Educational programs and prevention strategies address weed identification and techniques to limit weed spread. An IWM plan identifies high-quality (that is, areas with high desired plant cover) and valued areas and protects them from weed invasion and establishment - a key component in sustainable weed management. To forestall larger infestations, the IWM plan will guide identification and eradication of small weed patches.

Large infestations can persist and are very difficult and expensive to manage, and their development should be prevented in all cases. If infestations have developed, managers should work toward reestablishing healthy plant communities by shifting the competitive balance from the weeds to the desired vegetation. This can be accomplished by reducing the competitive vigor of the infestation through combinations of mechanical, chemical, cultural (including revegetation) or biological methods - or all these methods in concert.

Frequent monitoring of the site and annual evaluations will determine the adequacy of the plan. Comparing data from one year to the next allows the manager to spot trends and patterns, and to identify and make changes needed to attain land management goals.